San Francisco

San Francisco

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Take the Day in the Life Tour of  San Francisco's Probate Court...


Siracusa, Feder and Friends
Court Cases for Wednesday, August 10, 2011
The Honorable Sue Kaplan Presiding

PCN-98-270886....13 years in the SF Probate System!
PCN-99-272142....12 years!
PCN-00-273327...11 years!
PCN-00-280632...11 years!

PES-03-285547
PCN-05-287440
PTR-06-288604
PGN-06-289163
PTR-07-290603
PCN-08-291252
PCN-08-291935
PES-09-292348
PTR-09-292547
PCN-09-292822
PCN-09-293072
PTR-09-293073
PTR-10-293138
PTR-10-293159
PCN-10-293164
PCN-10-293276
PTR-10-293286
PCN-10-293325
PTR-10-293351
PES-10-293804
PES-10-293931
PCN-10-294001
PTR-10-294033
PCN-10-294034
PCN-11-294241
PCN-11-204306...Herb Thomas, Conservator!
PCN-11-294347...Herb Thomas, Conservator!
PTR-11-294648
PES-11-294805

A REMARKABLE 33 CASES FOR WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 10, 2011








Tuesday, August 9, 2011

August 9, 2011

Over 11,000 blog views.  WOO HOO!




Trustee

California Probate Code 

"16003.  If a trust has two or more beneficiaries, the trustee has a
duty to deal impartially with them and shall act impartially in
investing and managing the trust property, taking into account any
differing interests of the beneficiaries."


Here are just some examples of how the Trustee of the Catherine R. DeMartini Trust has failed in her duty to deal impartially with the beneficiaries.

To date, Elizabeth Adler's retaliatory actions have generated over $400,000 in professional fees for Ms. Adler and her attorneys.  She has never met with Paul DeMartini who is the major beneficiary with 50% interest.  She has not spoken with Paul in nearly two years and just last week she had Paul DeMartini's attorney disqualified.

Even though Catherine DeMartini wanted Paul DeMartini to have the family home, Elizabeth Adler has wasted thousands and thousands of dollars attempting to sell it.  How is that in Paul's best interest?  The house has been vacant for nearly a year and Ms. Adler had the duty to make the Trust profitable yet she never rented the house.  She could have found a month to month renter and gotten at the very least $2500 per month....$25,000 to the Trust!

Ms. Adler befriended Kristine Wright and shared confidential trust information with a third party.  At my attorney's request, Ms. Adler produced over 40 emails between her and Ms. Wright over a two month period.  Ms. Wright is NOT a beneficiary.  She is not a family member.  She is a convicted felon.  However, she is Tom DeMartini's girlfriend, and therefore, once again Ms. Adler has failed to treat the beneficiaries impartially.

She filed a bogus 850 petition against Lori DeMartini after the case was settled in court ordered mediation in October 2009...almost two years ago!

Elizabeth Adler  has blatantly favored one beneficiary over the other two over and over again.

I could provide dozens more examples of Ms. Adler's failures as Trustee.  Suffice it to say, she has regularly violated California Probate Code  and San Francisco Superior Court Rules of the Court.  In fact, she has broken all the rules and laws and is oh so happy with herself. "It's my job."

Keep in mind this Trustee is a PROFESSIONAL fiduciary, and therefore, has a higher standard of care.  It would be interesting to learn what others think of Ms. Adler's performance as Trustee.  I know my opinion may be a little jaded.
________________________________________________________________________________





Mirror, mirror on the wall,
Who is the evilest of them all?

 Elizabeth Adler...
When you look in the mirror,
who do you see? 

Conflict of Interest Revisited

So, the judge decides that my uncle and I have conflicting interests.  Well, we do not have conflicting interests yet the judge decides that our attorney needs to be disqualified nonetheless.  For the record, she stated that her decision was made even though I have never even had a trial.  I thought there was something called the United States Constitution...the Bill of Rights...supposedly it protects Americans against such arbitrary decisions by judges.

What I have been struggling with for the last three days is how the judge could rule on an imaginary conflict of interest between my uncle and I when she faces real conflicts of interest on a daily basis in her courtroom.  Below you will find just a few examples of those real conflicts:

PCN-11-294216:  Witherspoon & Siracusa for the Conservator; Brian McCaffrey for the Conservatee

PCN-06-289093:  Witherspoon & Siracusa for the Conservatee; Kato, Feder Sizuki for the Conservator

PCN-08-290878:  Witherspoon & Siracusa for the Conservatee AND the Conservator!

PTR-09-292513:  Witherspoon & Siracusa for both Conservators and Kato, Feder Sizuki for the Conservatee and Brian McCaffrey for the Conservator of the Estate!

PCN-06-289486:  Witherspoon & Siracusa for the Petitioner and Witherspoon & Siracusa for the Objector

PCN-09-292959:  Christine Witherspoon for the Conservator; Bruce Feder for the Conservatee

Okay.  Just one more.

PCN-09-292988:  Bruce Feder for the Conservator; Witherspoon and Siracusa for the Conservatee

As I said, these were just a few examples of the real conflicts that play out in San Francisco's probate court EVERY DAY!  No need to create imaginary conflicts!


Monday, August 8, 2011

Tuesday, August 9, 2011 Court Cases

SIRACUSA, FEDER AND FRIENDS...
PCN-99-272598
PGN-03-285147
PCN-05-286988
PCN-05-287634
PCN-05-288069
PCN-06-289093
PCN-06-289498
PCN-07-289683
PCN-08-290878
PCN-08-191201
PCN-09-292872
PTR-10-293756
PTR-11-294197
PCN-11-294216
PCN-11-294217
PES-11-294645

Court Call August 8, 2011

PCN-00-280632
PGN-03-285055
PCN-03-285153
PTR-05-288124
PTR-06-289286
PCN-07-289936
PTR-08-291490
PTR-09-292798
PCN-09-292917
PES-09-292936
PCN-09-293056
PTR-10-293653
PES-10-294059
PES-11-294583
PES-11-294815
PTR-08-291936