More Lizzy and Larry Lies...

In Liz Adler's latest court filing, she claims that the SFPD found that I had attempted to break into my Grandmother's house in late June.

I read the police report she attached to her latest pack of lies, and once again she has perjured herself in a document filed with the court! 

I encourage you to look at Lizzy and Larry's latest lies.  Read the police report for yourself.  It does not say I attempted to break in!  Go to...

http://webaccess.sftc.org/minds_asp_pdf/mainpage.asp?Web_Server=webaccess.sftc.org&MINDS_Server=ntimagex&Category=P&DocID=03276569

When I arrived at the house that day, the window (not lite) was broken, and I called the police.  While waiting for the police, I weeded the sidewalk in front of the house.  I filled a 12' x 4' plastic bag full of weeds.  Lizzie really does care about my Grandmother's house!   Four officers responded to my call.  I was told to fix the window and that a police report was not needed.

So, Lizzie, I called the police before you did.  Ron secured the door with the materials we had available to us just as the police officers instructed us to do.  When when we went back the following morning to permanently secure the door someone had already screwed a piece of plywood into the door and now the mailbox is blocked!

This woman and her dispicable attorneys are truly CAPABLE OF THE INCAPABLE!

San Francisco Superior Court Layoffs

Is San Francisco the only county in California affected by such significant layoffs and court room closures?  If so...

WHY?

The Conservator Adler

In addition to the fees generated by The Conservator Adler's money making divorce scheme on behalf of Owen J. Walsh, The Conservator Adler managed to generate the following conservator fees for herself and her attorney from 2006 through 2011...

2006*
$  31,028 to The Conservator Adler
$  16,557 to her Attorney
* in 2005 the previous conservator's charges were:  $3,187 to the conservator and $6,304 to the conservator's attorney

2007
$  23,898 to the Conservator Adler
$  16,334 to her Attorney

2008
$  37,201 to the Conservator Adler
$  15,744 to her Attorney

2009
$  60,430 to the lovely Ms. Adler
$  33,288 to her faithful attorney

2010
$  33,736 to Ms. Adler
$  10,272 to the Attorney

2011
$  29,667 to Conservator Elizabeth
$   9,300 to the Attorney

Mr. Walsh died recently and Ms. Adler is no doubt still calculating her final bill, however for the period, 2006 through the last accounting in 2011, The Conservator and her Attorney
made....

Drumroll, please!

Keep in mind this is in addition to the fees The Conservator collected for her divorce caper $174,259.  See previous blog.

The Conservator Adler:         $215,961
The Attorney:                         $101,495

For a grand total of:               $317,456

Total of divorce fees:             $174,259


$491,715

of Owen Walsh's beneficiaries' inheritance goes to The Conservator Adler and her attorneys!

Elizabeth Adler On Top of Her Game....

Remember Owen and Caridad Walsh?  See Previous Posts:  SF Probate Court - Owen and Caridad; Adler's Dirty Lies - Owen and Caridad; Pre-Nuptial - Owen and Caridad; Divorce - Owen and Caridad; They Are Killing Me. I am Half Dead; Case Settles Out of Court - Owen and Caridad...

For the divorce of Owen and Caridad initiated by the Conservator Adler:

 $ 78,109 to Deborah Ann Ram divorce attorney hired by Adler for Owen
$   4,246 to B. Conners attorney hired by Adler for Owen for divorce
$ 17,937 divorce proceedings fees approved by court (recipient unknown)
$  35,000 for future fees associated with divorce
$  29,667 for Adler's services for the divorce
$    9,300 for Adler's attorney, John Mangini, for the divorce


$174,259 in fees for the divorce of Owen and Caridad

Astounding!

A grand money making scheme!

Heh heh heh heh heh heh!

Feder & Siracusa Probate Cases

For July 20, 2011...


PTR-09-292513
PCN-01-281337
PCN-02-282740
PTR-05-287974
PTR-06-288961
PCN-06-289486
PTR-07-290580
PCN-08-290965
PES-09-292348
PTR-09-292537
PCN-09-202628
PES-09-292711
PCN-09-292737
PCN-09-292959
PTR-09-292961
PCN-09-292988
PTR-10-293159
PCN-10-292262
PCN-10-293955
PCN-11-294187
PES-11-294210
PCN-11-294213
PCN-11-294231
PCN-11-294271
PTR-11-294314
PCN-11-294334

PES-11-294725

PES-04-285938

Consider this....

Courts are too crowded so the Superior Court develops a program called Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).  This program is intended to assist attorneys and litigants in resolving their differences prior to trial.  The early settlement concept would, theoretically, free up the court's time.

Makes sense.

I participated in Alternative Dispute Resolution through court recommended mediation and the case settled on October 19, 2009.  However, the same case was filed against me less than two months later.  I am currently trying to get the court to recognize this faux pas and make a ruling.  Settled.  Can't file again.  Alternative Dispute Resolution!

In fact, there have already been many Supreme Court Rulings regarding this very same thing.  The highest Court in the land agrees that once a matter has been settled in mediation, it cannot be filed again.  The second case against me was even filed under the same court case number!

How many times does this happen?  Well, considering that there are many cases that have already been heard by the Supreme Court, I would guess it has happened many times.

This is a HUGE waste of the court's time.  These attorneys are not only blatantly mocking a program that was put into place to reduce backlog but they are creating even more backlog.

Let's Talk About Liz Adler - Part 2

The following is another possible reason why Liz Adler would want my attorney disqualified:

On August 25, 2011, we have a Motion for Summary Judgment hearing scheduled.  We filed the Motion a few weeks ago.  We are asking the Judge to rule that the Mediation Settlement of October of 2009 barred Adler from filing the same case against me a few weeks later.

Winning would mean that everything that happened after October 19, 2009 never should have happened,  therefore, their $400,000 in fees never should have happened.

Get rid of Herman in an "ex parte" hearing and no motion for summary judgment.  A distinct possibility!

July 19, 2011 Court Cases - S&C

Below are the Siracusa & Company court cases for July 19, 2011:

PCN-81-229714...a 30 year old conservatorship!
PCN-98-270694
PCN-05-287807
PES-07-289535
PCN-07-290038
PCN-07-290339
PCN-08-290878
PCN-08-290965
PTR-08-291803
PTR-09-292421
PES-09-293406
PCN-09-293061
PTR-10-293301
PES-10-293915
PES-11-294198
PGN-03-285147